From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 18 1:50:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC7D37B6A0 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0I9o2q03312; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101180950.f0I9o2q03312@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: ports/24383: libtool, USE_LIBTOOL, and graphics/dia Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/24383; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: , Subject: Re: ports/24383: libtool, USE_LIBTOOL, and graphics/dia Date: 18 Jan 2001 10:43:06 +0100 Gerald Pfeifer writes: > You do agree, however, that the failure mode I reported is undesirable > and should be fixed nevertheless, right? Not really. I don't particularly like it, but I can see the reasoning for it, and since I almost always use porteasy anyway, it doesn't bother me. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message