From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 6 9:36: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08B237B502 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.31 2000/08/22 00:15:13 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id QAA17584; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:39:49 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id JAA02074; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:51 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id MAA24463; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:35:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14813.65383.903678.216540@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:35:51 -0700 (MST) To: Kenneth W Cochran Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: breakage with two ed network devices In-Reply-To: <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> References: <14812.58143.609625.133015@hip186.ch.intel.com> <200010051637.KAA51557@harmony.village.org> <200010060408.WAA05189@harmony.village.org> <200010061618.MAA07034@world.std.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ On Friday, October 6, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: ] > > Please pardon my "jumping in" and/or ignorance... > > ed0 living on an IRQ that is "reserved" (somehow) for one > of the ATA "channels?" (ie. 14 and/or 15?) Hmmmm. Yeah, I've got ed0 living on IRQ15. However, this h/w combo has been running since 3.3 (including 4.0->4.1-RELEASE). > Hmmm... I might "question" an ATA-probe "there..." (?) > > Can this card (ed0) go to a different IRQ? Is that IRQ > disabled/reassigned (from PCI) in the BIOS/setup? No, it's hardwired in the card. I read on the archives when I bought it to disable the PnP stuff on the card because it wouldn't work without it. So, I assigned it IRQs manually through their stupid little DOG program. 15 and 9 were the only ones their setup program could find that weren't "conflicts" with something else. I can certainly try to move ed0 onto a different IRQ. > I might want to "move" this one, too; IRQ 9 is the "shared" > one & it has always "frightened" me some... :) > > (Brain-cobweb-digging) I also notice that that the "iomem" > is the same; shouldn't those be different segments? Probably so. Any suggestions for the second segment's starting position? LINT says nothing about it. > Hope I was at least slightly helpful... yeah, it was at least enlightening to see that IRQ14/IRQ15 are "meant" for ATA. That certainly does look like a smoking gun. However, I bring up the canonical fact that "it worked before this commit" .... Hopefully I'll have time over the weekend to futz with the IRQs on these cards. Maybe I'll just ditch the damn things and go get two PCI NICs ... who knows ... Thanks, -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message