From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 10 21:55:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EF316A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5043D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:11 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4C1433882D; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E048387A6;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org>
In-Reply-To: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
Message-ID: <20040810185449.U776@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
	<200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 -0000

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Matt Douhan wrote:

> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
>>>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
>>>> performs atrociously:
>>>>
>>>> neptune# netstat -ni | head
>>>> Name    Mtu Network       Address              Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts
>>>> Oerrs Coll
>>>> em0    1500 <Link#1>    00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840     1
>>>> 10858513
>>>
>>> I have no problems with em:
>>>> netstat -ni | head
>>>
>>> Name  Mtu   Network       Address            Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs
>>> Coll em0   1500  <Link#1>  00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761   0 1709686290
>>>  0     0
>>>
>>>> uname -rs
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
>>
>> Against what type of switch?
>>
>
> Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email

Actually, my post mentioned the Linksys ... is Spartak running the same? 
:)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664