From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:55:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EF316A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5043D2D for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C1433882D; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E048387A6; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Matt Douhan In-Reply-To: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org> Message-ID: <20040810185449.U776@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org> <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 -0000 On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Matt Douhan wrote: > On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are >>>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th >>>> performs atrociously: >>>> >>>> neptune# netstat -ni | head >>>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts >>>> Oerrs Coll >>>> em0 1500 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 >>>> 10858513 >>> >>> I have no problems with em: >>>> netstat -ni | head >>> >>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs >>> Coll em0 1500 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 >>> 0 0 >>> >>>> uname -rs >>> >>> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3 >> >> Against what type of switch? >> > > Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email Actually, my post mentioned the Linksys ... is Spartak running the same? :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664