From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 12 10:50:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com (imo-r05.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973D537B406 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Bsdguru@aol.com) Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id i.15.16ffaf54 (4415); Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:50:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Bsdguru@aol.com Message-ID: <15.16ffaf54.287f3d4d@aol.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:50:05 EDT Subject: Re: Network performance tuning. To: bicknell@ufp.org, hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In a message dated 07/11/2001 7:51:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, bicknell@ufp.org writes: > So, bottom line, in the end I would like a FreeBSD host that out > of the box can get 2-4 MBytes/sec across country (or better), but > that manages it in such a way that your standard web server running > on a FreeBSD box doesn't fall over. Is it just a pipe dream, or > can we make that happen with a little effort? > Of course if everyone on the internet does this, you are back to square one. The window is there for flow control and data integrity. You seek to undermine those concepts, which doesnt seem like a good idea for an "out of the box" operating system B To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message