From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 12 14:52:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC2A10656CF; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from codestr0m@osunix.org) Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com [209.85.211.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BC28FC18; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh8 with SMTP id 8so2091288ywh.3 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.197.40 with SMTP id z40mr2627830anp.68.1258036328128; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ([76.116.128.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm660386yxf.65.2009.11.12.06.32.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:32:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AFC1D0F.1020805@osunix.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:34:55 -0500 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20091112141519.GA66229@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091112141519.GA66229@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:50:24 +0000 Cc: maho@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiler discussion X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:13 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Following from the discussion on the system compiler for ia64, > I tried to list few major ports which I'd love to have on ia64, > but can't, because of GCC problems: > > - math/blas, lapack, lapack95, arpack, scalapack, atlas, etc. > - science/hdf5-18 (fortran APIs can't be built) > - french/aster (industial quality FEA code) > - cad/calculix (another good FEA code) > > All these depend on lang/gcc44, which doesn't build. > > The only fortran compiler I know to build and work > successfully on ia64 is (correct me if I'm wrong) g95. > > I wonder if it's possible/desirable/easy to use lang/g95 for > the above and other fortran-dependent ports? > > In principal, lang/g95 looks very good, and it's got > some features not available in gfortran, e.g. limited > support for 2003 standard. > > Any comments? > > Lots, but the main is that I don't think the g95 developer is still active. Please ping Andy and if you do get a response let me know.