From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 10 17:24:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8737F57;
 Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:24:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFF31D3;
 Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:24:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.100])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id UAA22498;
 Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:24:17 +0300 (EEST)
 (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
 by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
 id 1XRlcu-000N2y-Tz; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:24:16 +0300
Message-ID: <54108909.7050908@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:23:21 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-dtrace@FreeBSD.org
Subject: WITH_CTF vs -g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain
 <freebsd-toolchain.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:24:19 -0000


In my opinion WITH_CTF should imply -g in CFLAGS otherwise, as far as I can see,
there is nothing to generate CTF data from.  Forcing an end-user to remember to
additionally pass -g is not nice.

Also, I think that we can always have -g in CTFFLAGS, because the stripping step
takes care of the original DWARF data in any case.  But I am not 100% sure about
this.

What do you think?
Thanks!
-- 
Andriy Gapon