From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  2 20:17:31 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096DE1065673;
	Sun,  2 May 2010 20:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.161.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF58FC23;
	Sun,  2 May 2010 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1818471fxm.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 02 May 2010 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
	:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=oOV/NJbp4++nuKOi3WES+QfyYESwcTdaIKUGOj/QiP8=;
	b=EUqQCXOngOrazyL4b04xbSSsop0kS42q9TTbcbcfDN59NeqMVbuIkL1iSmcZ2ZRoq3
	9rJvkYhQ7Gokaic6frU3A9hIHC5+nmiAF+viG5nBJjKZ4o7FXlMznqoxxGDFYOnl3ZHr
	CY3eqBtTyEtQhXjwxc9uJyGjvCYfQctASlmns=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=LbnxzvRBLWE4cJi5FvPDQ/ly8DaMr7aM9ewHGSBGbcSJAp+8fudtVavmYwAlKQImNR
	Y1DUeiYdqGw/8sQ7UpCGgLVmqBKnw+tVPiiwxrfcvLcDqMLifdNbov+rvxDp9rNZwOi2
	TYll2OEhFzSwbcXR7bLnc0TV/gSJEDwqlJV1c=
Received: by 10.239.183.145 with SMTP id u17mr34259hbg.209.1272831440196; Sun, 
	02 May 2010 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.193.77 with HTTP; Sun, 2 May 2010 13:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BDD28E2.8010201@rawbw.com>
References: <op.vb0w1zrh43o42p@klevas> <4BDD28E2.8010201@rawbw.com>
From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 23:17:00 +0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0yOPIwfeUlNKUBBdTRDqYgAMOV2VzYyYv-SIJ@mail.gmail.com>
To: yuri@rawbw.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
	=?UTF-8?Q?Andrius_Mork=C5=ABnas?= <hinokind@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GSoC: Making ports work with clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 20:17:31 -0000

> Having tried clang++ I have a feeling that it's not quite ready to be a
> generic c++ compiler.
> It crashes a lot, fails on many quite simple c++ patterns. Very immature.
> Don't you feel it's too early to start project like you are going to given
> the state of clang with c++?
> You will just keep stumbling upon various problems with various ports and
> maybe will make 30% of c++ ports build with it at best.
Good - and those 30% of ports will help improve clang++ even more.
Hopefully over time that number will increase to 100% and we will be
able to say goodbye to gcc for good.