From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 14:24:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2273DB1967B for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21AE1245 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54A83DF80; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/54A83DF80; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: About different ABI between gcc and clang To: Odhiambo Washington References: <571B7694.5050006@FreeBSD.org> Cc: User Questions From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <571B85AE.1000003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:24:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VnNVOj2KQT2E9lfmuGwuDNgNImawOqHgQ" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:24:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VnNVOj2KQT2E9lfmuGwuDNgNImawOqHgQ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="GmOf4mfGOVEUQ1DLqJgXSQohGpAjgBiBI" From: Matthew Seaman To: Odhiambo Washington Cc: User Questions Message-ID: <571B85AE.1000003@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: About different ABI between gcc and clang References: <571B7694.5050006@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: --GmOf4mfGOVEUQ1DLqJgXSQohGpAjgBiBI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/04/2016 14:59, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On my box, I have: >=20 > root@gw:/usr/home/wash # `which clang` --version > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 2014051= 2 > Target: i386-unknown-freebsd9.3 > Thread model: posix > root@gw:/usr/home/wash # clang --version > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 2014051= 2 > Target: i386-unknown-freebsd9.3 > Thread model: posix >=20 > root@gw:/usr/home/wash # gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] > Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is= NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURP= OSE. >=20 > root@gw:/usr/home/wash # which gcc > /usr/bin/gcc > root@gw:/usr/home/wash # /usr/bin/gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] > Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is= NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURP= OSE. >=20 > Any suggestion on what I should do? Those are the compilers that come with the base system. Try installing something more recent from ports. > I am trying to compile squid-4.0.9 which isn't in the ports. >=20 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D203860 Not sure why that hasn't been committed yet. Cheers, Matthew --GmOf4mfGOVEUQ1DLqJgXSQohGpAjgBiBI-- --VnNVOj2KQT2E9lfmuGwuDNgNImawOqHgQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXG4W0XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATeOIP/RfGaX05iaLatlA6dmGUptxC JpMqR8J9ZAwoH2SFFTEOHYqRV4gXZ7U5NNZvf1RzCXc/9dLzEYDb+Rb8wOKlqNY6 BsbV4Xcz//4Snte42WXyCmODUTBxfaM6veRkut7v5UXTPTJ3lDo9X2O5LdYAlMsK QWXVL/mRN8n/toUM0gz9LcouiOxROR6r5R+tmIykMH/1+aKngqlxbd65QhTfpeQC zXXZ1X0Q3ZpWfWDZAR6RjV5MKSFELwaewDKQzp0M66unFBTf0t9P7G7W64GrKPfq UTJKX9o3q7zS0+QetB9lAua/Zmb7rrV+GDZej0/IzRF+FFL76oEo04vWwim9zGZ1 xkDoZvKo1O/Ctd+msfwJQpjCh+U76SdRlg/fq1ArWaYJUn9UPKDouh/jSHPSTQTj qHel6pLl53CIjTZs0XOIBez5YG+RsBXZl/3rRV9+LEsaWFr2gSVn71CUYHt2tf2M fjt+5xm8/3wWEBo0YhKjGLKdX++/WEA8qm0iDg4dkmnREHyptuCkAbMO5XbrW3RX yuxNkhz52TMSULZlthVtFSRzae1EDavWDrUfdZb89o7A1FW46wrhYCydWMXbILxX Eq3MnBhMFgwD7vAllAR1R8e7UnXI90tn85ev/qTO3N1KtUaza3N+xY+QwtXXX1+C dbbGX8CsbVTNFQ5+o5Zy =ufY4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VnNVOj2KQT2E9lfmuGwuDNgNImawOqHgQ--