Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Shawn Rutledge <shawndr@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: soft updates and fsck in practice Message-ID: <20010403170515.26127.qmail@web2302.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So, after reading Kirk's Usenix paper and the list archives, I keep seeing that with Soft Updates you "shouldn't have to" fsck a filesystem. In theory, you may just loose a little space over time. I've also read Terry Lambert's post (SU/LFS/JFS) warning against using SU for fast failure recovery (but may be comfortable with the risks for now, given the effort in porting LFS or a JFS to FreeBSD -- i.e. some -vs- none). My question: Is anyone running a system using soft updates and NOT fscking after crashes? Is it even reasonable in practice? Mount refuses to mount a filesystem that isn't marked clean. If anyone is doing the above, what (non-fsck) mechanism do you use to mark the filesystems clean? I've been experimenting with 4.2-RELEASE but have current and stable available as well. Thanks, ===== Shawn Rutledge (shawndr@yahoo.com) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010403170515.26127.qmail>