Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:53:26 +0600 From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: Fedor Dikarev <fedor.dikarev@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: About Freebsd port net/ntopng Message-ID: <CA%2BnPUkzLPXyWTRVtu6xry1iHN2tc9o-xwHGEc9khys8fYcuJVQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAA9ksCb4g1vZ36vcRerKa3=diNyAsQFh3f-fcbCX3E%2B5xNqrWg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA9ksCb4g1vZ36vcRerKa3=diNyAsQFh3f-fcbCX3E%2B5xNqrWg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=E2=80=8BHi, I am already working on upgrading to the latest. Nearly finished. Within a day or two I will submit it. BR, Muhammad=E2=80=8B On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Fedor Dikarev <fedor.dikarev@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Muhammad Moinur Rahman! > > I've found that you are maintainer of net/ntopng freebsd port. > I've tried to build ntopng and found that it's marked as BROKEN. So I > started to analyse what's broken and find right URL for distfiles. And al= so > I've made some patches so now it can be build without gcc (I had build > successfully using clang on FreeBSD 10). > And today while I try to reproduce all of this I found that ntopng 1.2.1 > was released just few hours ago. > > So what your opinion, what will be better: should I send patches to you > and there will be net/ntopng11 in ports or upgrade net/ntopng to 1.2.1 is > just enough? > > -- > Fedor Dikarev >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BnPUkzLPXyWTRVtu6xry1iHN2tc9o-xwHGEc9khys8fYcuJVQ>