From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 16:07:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514EF1065672; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (mr0.ht-systems.ru [78.110.50.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036EB8FC1B; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from [78.110.49.49] (helo=quasar.ht-systems.ru) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Jjcpk-0003rO-BS; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:07:36 +0400 Received: by quasar.ht-systems.ru (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 14F359F0E; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:07:35 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:07:34 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Message-Id: <20080409200734.8b0171eb.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080409170838.3c2196ac@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <200804082151.m38Lp8P5099496@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080409170134.b7c2c60d.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207746223.3684.38.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080409171006.71497d1c.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207746652.3684.40.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080409172224.08474c39.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207747572.3684.42.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080409170838.3c2196ac@peedub.jennejohn.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, joerg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/simulavr Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:07:39 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:08:38 +0200 Gary Jennejohn mentioned: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:26:12 +0200 > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > Stanislav Sedov p____e v st 09. 04. 2008 v 17:22 +0400: > > > > > > I don't know. I just marked the port BROKEN :) > > > > > > > > > > Ok, portmgr don't know... (/me is making a note in his notebook) > > > :-) > > > > > > pav-the-mark-broken-monster > > > > That's me, when I take a break from being > > pav-the-mailforwarding-party-crasher :) > > > > As for the simulavr port, I don't have a strong preference for it moving > > to emulators or staying where it's now. > > > > Just my 2 (Euro)cents. Considering that it's been in devel for the > last 5-1/2 years it seems a littel extreme to move it to emulation for > purely aesthetic reasons. > It's not aesthetic but consistency reason. We have a strong policy to put in devel only ports that can't be clearly associated with other categories. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE