From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 09:47:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9C16A4D0 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:47:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DDF43D1F for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:47:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i899i8oS040594 for cvs-all@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:44:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i899fmta039318; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:41:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <414025D1.1080903@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:43:45 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <200409081238.i88CcN0U067677@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040908204556.GF5179@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040908204556.GF5179@cell.sick.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Roman Kurakin cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau if_ct.c src/sys/dev/cx if_cx.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:47:20 -0000 Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:38:23PM +0000, Roman Kurakin wrote: >R> rik 2004-09-08 12:38:23 UTC >R> >R> FreeBSD src repository >R> >R> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5) >R> sys/dev/ctau if_ct.c >R> sys/dev/cx if_cx.c >R> Log: >R> MFC: mark cx(4) and ctau(4) as non MPSAFE. >R> Approved by: re (scottl) > >Is cp(4) MPSAFE? > > No, only in rik_netperf branch in perforce. cp(4) was marked as non MPSAFE by rwatson@ before. By the way I need testers for what I've already done. rik >[/me wonders, since he uses it in production] > > >