From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 9 20:06:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E751065670; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail.sippysoft.com (mail.sippysoft.com [4.59.13.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2848FC0C; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s0106005004e13421.vs.shawcable.net ([70.71.175.212] helo=[192.168.1.79]) by mail.sippysoft.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPeh-000MRT-Dx; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:06:47 -0800 Message-ID: <4D77DDD1.1040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:06:41 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaakko Heinonen References: <201103081700.p28H0V9A080455@svn.freebsd.org> <20110308173611.GA44635@ws64.jh.dy.fi> <4D772F5B.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <20110309151938.GA1526@a91-153-123-205.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <4D77B437.7090604@FreeBSD.org> <20110309190405.GA2308@a91-153-123-205.elisa-laajakaista.fi> In-Reply-To: <20110309190405.GA2308@a91-153-123-205.elisa-laajakaista.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sobomax@sippysoft.com X-ssp-trusted: yes Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219400 - head/sys/geom/label X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:06:48 -0000 On 3/9/2011 11:04 AM, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > On 2011-03-09, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> > OK, so what should I do to resolve the issue in question? Should I go >> > forward and MFC less generic patch to geom_label code to strip out the >> > leading slashes from the ext2fs labels? > I am not against merging it. Maybe revert the hack in head after > merging? OK, sure. -Maxim