Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:47:50 -0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/savecore savecore.c 
Message-ID:  <20020312184750.D9702380A@overcee.wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzpr8mpyauy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> writes:
> > Yes, but why.  It assumes that subtracting kernbase from a virtual
> > address will give on offset into the core dump, ie a phsyical address.
> > This doesn't work on sparc64.
> 
> I was told that it did work, but I'll take your word that it doesn't.
> The question is, what *does* work?

If you're referring to our conversation, I said "it looks like it might
be like the x86".  From my understanding of what Jake told me before, there
is no linear mapping of kernel memory on sparc64.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020312184750.D9702380A>