Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:13:10 +0200 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <200605091913.11439.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <20060509165908.GA91514@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200605071756.k47HuSvD033837@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <200605091844.59789.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20060509165908.GA91514@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:59, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:44:59PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:34, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I'd prefer the warning to be silenced. You can either commit the PR > > > or make the LATEST_LINK conditional on X_WINDOW_SYSTEM being set > > > (i.e. for xorg have the LATEST_LINK in imake-4 and vice versa). That > > > will be a NOP, but it will shut up the script. > > > > Ah excellent sneaky idea. Would NO_LATEST_LINK in IGNORE case like the > > following do then? > > That should also be fine, thanks. Done. Thanks. Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605091913.11439.dejan.lesjak>