Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 May 2006 19:13:10 +0200
From:      Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
Message-ID:  <200605091913.11439.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
In-Reply-To: <20060509165908.GA91514@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <200605071756.k47HuSvD033837@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <200605091844.59789.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20060509165908.GA91514@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:59, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:44:59PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:34, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > I'd prefer the warning to be silenced.  You can either commit the PR
> > > or make the LATEST_LINK conditional on X_WINDOW_SYSTEM being set
> > > (i.e. for xorg have the LATEST_LINK in imake-4 and vice versa).  That
> > > will be a NOP, but it will shut up the script.
> >
> > Ah excellent sneaky idea. Would NO_LATEST_LINK in IGNORE case like the
> > following do then?
>
> That should also be fine, thanks.

Done. Thanks.

Dejan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605091913.11439.dejan.lesjak>