From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 1 22:07:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21AC16A400 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raaf@zen.mooo.com) Received: from smtp-4.orange.nl (smtp-4.orange.nl [193.252.22.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A220113C489 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raaf@zen.mooo.com) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6302.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1CD1D700008D for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:07:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zen.mooo.com (s559292f8.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.146.146.248]) by mwinf6302.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 076D37000085; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:07:38 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070701220739304.076D37000085@mwinf6302.orange.nl Received: from zen.mooo.com (zen.mooo.com [127.0.0.1]) by zen.mooo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176616F; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <468825A9.80200@zen.mooo.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:07:37 +0200 From: Raaf User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Chu References: <4687FF75.3000108@zen.mooo.com> <47a4f3080707011454m6e06c97bu4764b32a65160ad6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47a4f3080707011454m6e06c97bu4764b32a65160ad6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dennis Melentyev , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot mount Sony Ericsson mobile phone, msdosfs too restrictive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:07:41 -0000 Brian Chu wrote: > Raaf, > > What's the size of the memory stick? Is it 32MB like Dennis has? > It's a 64MB memory stick using FAT12. > The check for the field that affected you isn't critical to msdosfs' > operation, but the field itself is specified to be non-zero. > Konstantin, is it alright to remove this field? > It seems there are more people having problems with the sanity checking code of msdosfs, see also this related pr: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93860