From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 21 08:55:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739F16A4CF for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:55:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from liberty.onthenet.com.au (liberty.OntheNet.com.au [203.22.124.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9342843D4C for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from [203.144.25.99] (cpe-99-25.fr-dsl.bris.onthenet.net [203.144.25.99])j4L8tqnP080745; Sat, 21 May 2005 18:55:53 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <428EF788.8070700@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 18:55:36 +1000 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler References: <428BC6D0.90207@freebsd.org> <428CFF53.7070907@pop.agri.ch> <428D2D6C.5050601@freebsd.org> <428E59DE.9000900@pop.agri.ch> <428E7734.9060606@freebsd.org> <428ED750.70308@pop.agri.ch> <428EE671.5030900@freebsd.org> <428EE966.4040305@pop.agri.ch> In-Reply-To: <428EE966.4040305@pop.agri.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated install ISO X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 08:55:56 -0000 Hi Andreas, >> No, that's perfectly fine. In fact, I've not run a machine with that >> much RAM. I wonder if that's the issue :) > > Hm, I could remove one DIMM and see it gets better? You can artificially reduce the amount of RAM present from the loader prompt with OK set hw.physmem=512M ... or whatever value. It might be worthwhile to try it at 512M and see how it goes. The builds I've done have been on machines with 512 and 640M. >>> The sig 11 appeared mostly when I switched virtual console. >> >> Is this while running a build ? > > Yes, on one console a 'make buildworld' and on another console usual > shell activities. Then I saw the sig 11 in the make console. I'll try done some console switching while building on a VTY - I usually kick it off in a remote login. later, Peter.