Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 05:42:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196577] [maintainer] cad/elmerfem: Update to 8.0.20150616 (and use blaslapack for math/arpack-ng) Message-ID: <bug-196577-13-r8AH84VU0p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-196577-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-196577-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196577 --- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #14) Nothing is wrong with patches in Bugzilla. Phabricator is the place where reviews can/should/ought to take place, which can save time going back and forth on bugzilla, especially if changes are required. I also think its important to have a documented review too, especially in the cases where the committer is not (yet) a ports committer. Having said that, it's not a requirement, I was just offering :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196577-13-r8AH84VU0p>