From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 17 01:22:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C0016A4DA for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwoolworth@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE1A43D46 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:22:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwoolworth@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so932869nfc for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:22:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=i126bcVBGJrfJrvmW5j13vUZnUtobfdNJ59xbDjMFYeczjju5QbZYf34Gecz8de/LrW3XQpwH3vTm4Zn9RR75gIRnMX11L/px5KIwkmqCsn6SHc0xN9vhC9snH19ToY8IjwT1PqjCrcW95V+eTePS8ZzsG78+xMmT08fERFjvJ8= Received: by 10.49.41.18 with SMTP id t18mr1465330nfj; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.207.16 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <10fd06c60608161822n138d565rb5a7e4b54a22e5e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:22:31 -0500 From: "Derrick T. Woolworth" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Binding NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:22:34 -0000 Is there currently any way to bind three network interfaces to a single IP address? With our NetApp (yeah, I realize its a whole different animal, but still), we can use the vif interface or virtual interface to increase bandwidth to the device. I've looked at carp and bridging and I don't think these are going to do what I'm wanting - just wondering if there's some command I'm not familiar with to bind network interfaces so they load-balance... Thanks, D