From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 11 11:30:21 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14798
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:30:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA14728
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:30:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: (from hasty@localhost)
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29537
          for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:30:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 11:30:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-Id: <199803111930.LAA29537@rah.star-gate.com>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:  my worldstone
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I don't consider cheating if I post my mods to my make.conf and I do
consider them reasonable given thats what I use here in my system.

Last but not least I am not in a world stone race because I don't
have a system suitable to compete. 

Different topic, 

It will be nice if people with very fast systems and i/o subsystems to 
post their world stone. It has been alluded in the past that we have
a bottle neck in the system we seem to hover around 100 minutes. For
instance, Simon Shapiro posted in the past that increasing the i/o
subsystem like by using a DPT couple with fast disks didn't seem
to improve his relative world stone benchmark.

	Amancio

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message