From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:56:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBA516A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863D543FCB; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:56:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vW64-0003Wr-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 12:58:56 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vW64-0003VW-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 12:58:56 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h865vjvt074625; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:57:45 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h865vjC1074569; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:57:45 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:57:45 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20030906055745.GB72373@regency.nsu.ru> References: <42548.1062488547@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030902004917.S6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F58B8B7.30107@tcoip.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, dcs@tcoip.com.br, DougB@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Doug Barton cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 05:56:30 -0000 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > > I recall bde being in favour of respecting English rules, meaning > > NOOPTIONS. :-) > > > > So this consensus isn't at all all that consensual. > > ISTR bde was pretty much alone on his side of the fence. > > A prime example of why NOFOO is a bad idea, BTW, is the (now obsolete) > NODESCRYPTLINKS option. I keep reading that first part as "nodes" > instead of "no DES", and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I second this. ./danfe