From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 3 23:09:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E550716A41F for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A14543D68 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 99344 invoked by uid 399); 3 Aug 2005 23:09:17 -0000 Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (66.150.201.101) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 3 Aug 2005 23:09:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7896 invoked by uid 399); 3 Aug 2005 23:09:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@69.175.228.47) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 3 Aug 2005 23:09:14 -0000 Message-ID: <42F14E99.8@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:09:13 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Arno J. Klaassen" References: <53d4293a37f280317d52338c2fc6fc6d@FreeBSD.org> <20050612025402.GD67746@dragon.NUXI.org> <200506151655.52894.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050616010629.GA3554@hub.freebsd.org> <42EEC3B9.1090507@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Death to toor X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:09:27 -0000 Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > yop, i did it that way before; but I got tired of all tests in .profile, > .bash_profile, .bashrc (mixing gdm and ssh on the same box gives me > the same headaches of not taking the time to figure out exactly which > shell uses what file, in what order and overruled by what environment ...) Well, I can't help you there. > including /bin/bash in the base-system would > be a nice thing as well There is extensive discussion in the archives about why this is incredibly unlikely to happen, so I wouldn't hold your breath. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection