Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:38:29 -0600
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: why sources? why not binaries? 
Message-ID:  <199812301638.KAA37720@nospam.hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr>  of "Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:56:56 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812300855130.25745-100000@finland.ispro.net.tr> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Evren Yurtesen writes:
> hello,
> I wonder why we need to grab the sources and compile when
> we need to upgrade to a never version (with make world)
> why can't we get binaries and then just install with make installworld ?
> then just 1 person would compile then and it would save a lot time
> thanks

As others have pointed out, binaries are available for upgrades via
download.

But in my case at the end of a 28.8 modem its much faster to update my
sources with cvsup and recompile than to download the binaries.


--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812301638.KAA37720>