Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 16:49:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980529164610.17992P-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <11691.896448831@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh wrote: > I believe people would like to get rid of NAT when v6 is deployed, > so there will be no private address, I believe... For the most part your belief would be correct however in a small number of cases I find NAT to be highly useful. I have a number of machines running at home which are not secured and should not be reachable via global addresses. In addition, I keep my Win95/NT/Netware boxes behind the NAT on general principle. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980529164610.17992P-100000>