From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 13:46:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43ACA37B40E for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A4E43F93 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:46:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 32638 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 20:46:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 15 May 2003 20:46:15 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4FKk9p0035571; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:46:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <00f801c31afc$94250240$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:46:18 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Killing cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Strange systat output on SMP FreeBSD 5.0-Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:46:16 -0000 On 15-May-2003 Killing wrote: > /0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100 > XXXXXXXXXX > root idle: cpu1 XXXXXXXXXX > root idle: cpu2 XXXXXXXXXX > root idle: cpu3 XXXXXXXXXX > root idle: cpu0 XXXXXXXXXX > > Looks rather strange to me is this right? Its a dual Xeon box which > has hyperthreading enabled so there should be 4 cpus how come > there are 5 idle "processes" 1 for each cpu + ? The is not a process, it's a measure of how idle the system is. It's generated from the same thing %idle in top(1) comes from. Probably systat should ignore the actual idle processes. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/