From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 00:15:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CB81065672; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F8D8FC0A; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.23.7.29] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1A0FS3V043336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:15:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:15:23 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1C3260CA-8CDB-4C84-A591-637D2B342683@xcllnt.net> References: <201202092044.q19KiLUT027539@svn.freebsd.org> To: Eitan Adler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r231298 - head/etc X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:15:37 -0000 On Feb 9, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >> On Feb 9, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >>> Author: eadler >>> Date: Thu Feb 9 20:44:20 2012 >>> New Revision: 231298 >>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/231298 >>> >>> Log: >>> Make etc/Makefile more conflict resistant >> >> Nice. Question though: why not the less verbose > > Either would have worked but I went with what was in the original > patch. If it is worth it I could change to use the format you > describe. I think it's convention (see sys/modules/Makefile or lib/Makefile), but I could just as well be mistaken (i.e. picked the only makefiles that do this :-) I leave it up to you... -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net