From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 09:52:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE4016A4CE; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from daemon.li (daemon.li [213.203.244.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232F243D1F; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:52:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from josef@daemon.li) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by 213-203-244-86 with local; Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:46:01 +0000 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:46:01 +0000 From: Josef El-Rayes To: Ceri Davies , www@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20031214134600.GA23259@daemon.li> References: <20031214122749.GC340@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031214122749.GC340@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Reply-Path: j.el-rayes@daemon.li Subject: Re: Website errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: j.el-rayes@daemon.li List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:52:57 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > This raises the question: what we do with broken links here? > They're clearly no use pointing to non-existent pages, but is an entry > in here worth having if there's nothing to link to? I'm tempted to say > "yes", and just remove the links on dead stories that can't be found. i agree with you. just remove the dead links to avoid reports on already noted broken links, but keep the entry, which is still useful/information without the corresponding document. josef