Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:25:46 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Guidelines for new port version variables
Message-ID:  <20000928172546.A91774@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009281415290.66918-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:19:51PM -0700
References:  <20000928120548.A89733@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009281415290.66918-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:19:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The "_0" is implicit..I didnt think the extra spam on the majority of
> packages is needed

Optionally allowing "_0" would certainly help me remember to deal with
this.  If I see it in the Makefile it is *very* easy for me to bump it
(ore reset to 0).

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000928172546.A91774>