From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 07:57:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6EC37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2433443F85 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:57:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john.cagle@hp.com) Received: from cceexg13.americas.cpqcorp.net (cceexg13.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.110.250.119]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8754EEAF5; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:57:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.110.250.85]) by cceexg13.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6673); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:57:04 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:57:04 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Compaq Evo N610c Thread-Index: AcNWmNYPzWuwZ1IGR+2NtMxRZio0WwADbVoA From: "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" To: "Tony Maher" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2003 14:57:04.0925 (UTC) FILETIME=[D71284D0:01C356AA] cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_Blacqui=E8re?= cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Compaq Evo N610c X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:57:14 -0000 Which version of the N610C BIOS are you using? (F.14 is the latest on = the hp.com website.) I know that the _OSI("Windows 2001") bug will be = fixed in the F.15 release, but I don't think the _GL_ portion of your = patch will be included. Did you have to remove the Acquire & Release of = _GL_ in order to get xbat to work? (This is not a problem we see with = Linux ACPI in 2.4.21, so I think that FreeBSD's ACPI stack needs = updating.) Thanks, John -------------------------------- John Cagle john.cagle@hp.com Principal Member Technical Staff Industry Standard Servers Hewlett-Packard Company > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Blacqui=E8re [mailto:freebsd-current@guldan.demon.nl]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:47 AM > To: Tony Maher > Cc: current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Compaq Evo N610c >=20 >=20 >=20 > Great this works ;-) >=20 > even with the drive bay battery removed and inserted ;-)=20 >=20 > Only thing stil acts weird is the pcmcia (wireless) stuff... > It seems the first memory ports can't be used zo 0x100-0x13f but the > second card gets a other pool 0x180 i think and works ... > maybe i can overrule or block the first block ? >=20 > Robert >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:19:31PM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > >=20 > > Update on Compaq Evo N610c > >=20 > > Thanks to an email from Simon in the UK I now have battery support > > in my N610c. > >=20 > > /boot/loader.conf is now > >=20 > > hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=3D1 > > acpi_dsdt_load=3D"YES" > > acpi_dsdt_name=3D"/boot/acpi_dsdt.aml > >=20 > > A patch for acpi_dsdt is attached. > >=20 > > Now xbatt (and apm) works perfectly. > >=20 > > Now all I need is another unexpected email that details how=20 > to solve the > > suspending problem (actually the resumption) and the=20 > switching between X > > and vga screen sync problem and I'd be completely set ;-) > >=20 > > Thanks again to Simon! > >=20 > > cheers > > -- > > tonym >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? > Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? > FreeBSD: Are you guys coming or what? > OpenBSD: He guys you left some holes out there! >=20