Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 20:18:00 -0500 From: Nathan Schuler <nschuler@sparrow.sanasys.com> To: Paul <psd@worldaccess.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapi Message-ID: <2.2.32.19970531011800.006d881c@sparrow.sanasys.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>Not sure. But as for file system performance, nothing beats the BSD UNIX's. >And also not the FreeBSD UNIX's? :-) >Is that based on the same? Yes this includes FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, BSDi, and 4.4BSD >>This list was most likely setup for corporate users. I use BSDI 3.0 and >>BSDI 2.1 in my office. > >Erhm... That's the official BSD distrib or? What are the main differences >with FreeBSD? Actually the "official" BSD is the 4.4BSD from UC Berkeley. All other BSD UNIX's are derived from it. As for differences, they are practically identical. They can execute BSD binaries, although they each have their own proprietary binaries. FreeBSD is considered to be the fastest of the BSD's. BSDi is known for its robustness, although advanced features take a while to appear. BSDi is also the only commercial distribution of BSD. NetBSD is known for being able to run on just about anything, namely Mac. Nathan Schuler <nschuler@sanasys.com> UNIX Netwoking Solutions / Systems Administrator Sana Systems Inc. Clinton, IA 52732 (319) 242-5770
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2.2.32.19970531011800.006d881c>