From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 09:22:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469831065693; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080C78FC15; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6C41FFC36; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0C2E1845D4; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:22:29 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Doug Barton References: <4C6CD229.1010401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:22:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4C6CD229.1010401@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:41:45 -0700") Message-ID: <867hjndkiz.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: delphij@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD grep performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:22:30 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > I'm not going to re-state my opinion here except to say it hasn't > changed. Even if the performance were not an issue I think the bugs > mentioned below combined with your 4-day absence should also have been > considerations. However, in regards to this particular case I think > it's pretty obvious that I'm either alone, or in a very non-vocal > group; so c'est la vie. "This is madness!" "Madness? This... is... CURRENT!" DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no