From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jun 28 18:49:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D3914BFE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:49:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@rush.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA01526; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:52:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:52:38 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, sandman@hub.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Linux vs NT: a new test In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Don't know how many ppl saw/read the following: > > http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,1015266,00.html > > One of the comments on Slashdot was the question as to how well 4.4lite > would have done in the same tests, as they "theorize" that alot of the > problems revolve around Linux's IP stack... > > Now if only we had a working MMAP, we'd be all set... Do you have any URLs or tests that show the flaws in FreeBSD's mmap? Just interested to know what they are. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message