From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 6 15:46:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AD837B401 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neptune.he.net (neptune.he.net [216.218.166.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FE843F85 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:46:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fluid@sfmidimafia.com) Received: from [192.168.0.24] (stalwart.codysbooks.COM [209.133.54.175]) by neptune.he.net (8.8.6p2003-03-31/8.8.2) with ESMTP id PAA09708; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:46:34 -0700 From: "Scott R." To: Charlie Schluting In-Reply-To: <20030806153607.U65087@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> References: <20030806085137.W47031@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> <20030806220811.GA70191@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030806153607.U65087@cheshire.cat.pdx.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: SFMM Message-Id: <1060210078.95208.25.camel@borges> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:47:58 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntop broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 22:46:32 -0000 On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 22:39, Charlie Schluting wrote: > 5BOn Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote: > > > > > > Howdy, > > > Running 5.0. > > > > cvsup to 5.1 and retry. The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system. > > > > Kris > > Interesting. So, I tried, and it deleted all my ports. I was using this: > > *default host=cvsup10.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs > *default tag=RELENG_5_1 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > ports-base > ports-all > > Any ideas? Thanks a bunch :) Yes. Your tag for ports should be '.', so: *default tag=. not *default tag=RELENG_5_1 There is no such animal and that is why it deleted all of your ports instead of updating them. In addition, specifying 'ports-all' is sufficient ('ports-base' is not needed unless you are only cvsup'ing individual collections). -Scott