From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 20 12:48:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E137B5BE for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:48:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm016-021.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.229]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12243; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:48:16 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 687A31949; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:46:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:46:40 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Ron Rosson Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/19398: fetchmail lacks a dependency Message-ID: <20000620154640.B32776@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006201400.HAA43349@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200006201400.HAA43349@freefall.freebsd.org>; from insane@oneinsane.net on Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:00:04AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 07:00:04AM -0700, Ron Rosson wrote: > Actually instead of cluttering the ports tree with another port why > not just add a "if" statement to make the dependency for > it. Because then there would be no package that includes fetchmailconf, and thus fetchmailconf won't be on -RELEASE CD sets. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message