From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 16 12:39:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA15321 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA15310 for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA18052; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma018050; Fri May 16 12:38:12 1997 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) id MAA02622; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199705161938.MAA02622@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: good mail filter program? In-Reply-To: <199705161414.QAA02465@eac.iafrica.com> from Robert Nordier at "May 16, 97 04:14:49 pm" To: rnordier@iafrica.com (Robert Nordier) Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Cc: proot@horton.iaces.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I've been using "filter", which used to be part of elm (but seems to > > > be no more), but it mysteriously dies all the time, causing bounce > > > messages. So I'm trying to upgrade. > > > > > > Any ideas appreciated. > > > > Well, there's procmail. I don't know how to use it, but I've seen it > > recommend many times. > > > > However, I've used filter (from elm) for years. And am using it now > > on FreeBSD with no problems. Did you build your own elm or install the > > package? The package works fine. > > Elm's "filter" has severe problems with buffer overflows. Even some > messages on the "cvs-all" list have caused it to dump core. > > This from the README.ME+ file: > > | - Makefile now don't compile or install 'filter' because security > | problems in it. Yes, procmail seems to do the trick. Thanks, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com