From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 8 16:57:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6169610B; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1:2300:1001:1001:1001:face]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 329F42531; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (70.15.88.86.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [70.15.88.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A09DA13DAE; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:57:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us A09DA13DAE Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:57:50 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Andreas Nilsson Subject: Re: Building 9.2-RELEASE on 10-stable Message-ID: <20131108165750.GS89594@glenbarber.us> References: <20131107204218.GG89594@glenbarber.us> <1383860913.27740.44511277.4D9CF1BF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20131107234832.GJ89594@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EmW68jKGQIhj8inv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: Mark Felder , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 16:57:54 -0000 --EmW68jKGQIhj8inv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:02:12AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Now I managed to reproduce the error: >=20 > A failure has been detected in another branch of the parallel make >=20 > make[1]: stopped in /src/9.2 >=20 > --- upgrade_checks --- >=20 > *** [upgrade_checks] Error code 2 >=20 > make: stopped in /src/9.2 >=20 > 1 error > make: stopped in /src/9.2 >=20 This is one of the races I was talking about. In some of my tests, I found two things: 1.) Running 'make make buildworld -j8[...]'* in general would work, because make(1) would be built first. That seems to be part of the problem here, the toolchain has not yet decided what make(1) to build (bmake for fmake), which causes the upgrade_checks phase to fail. * Note the 'make make' is not a typo. 2.) Running the build without '-j' set at all, in most cases, would succeed. (Note: even '-j1' would fall over occasionally.) Glen --EmW68jKGQIhj8inv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSfRgOAAoJELls3eqvi17Qg98QAJvs3jEidXbuHdR4Sg7NvbLt 8duMVeTvJ8yGiWTwVX/hWrVno3Q3gIJBJ+f+UWLths+e297SjjbT3I9CgDasn8zk ujJnXuWxKRu9jL9/0m3zM3eAe2sm9/l6VkJp/7pkhkJBDO0/vx1mmk8D2POz0d+/ SB18113wBFVeB+OgL23qbJ6xvZr10j4qmEY4SBs6oWU4qTb68qtLDvv57t4+cED+ WDBDr/Phdo5sZaYRWISqDHP+krSmY58sXoPdmWWaC5RQqkJYt+QAkhF5Tiy8txcx lIQ9dNPqWegvOtXb4wZWcyZPhUhzFYe9PIKzXD95d/Bqh+wkEnOY/A/wmPai7rM7 9CKBHB7+f2SEysoYATtrxyJ65y2He33wVtA0P9cJAwD42AZaDi/UjTqt7bmhh8q1 oZkuAHVuIy2MmR29BQ2XpZ5cZiE02wzw+yzxJVISTtPUIk5bpKeyZVvc+GJ2Pd/W vhDdXxllLsRkXm/2/EndnxlA8D/xZRZyiCYCuhFsmA03VK47L5lUfMZLQ5TmQGUN MJKOG+rpzxUqRTr8v7MxsRPRzvMZhRINNgmB8VApFWgo/80ETO2nJ/a8XLEGbkFL m3pabp1MErLSVtu36TZ3KuuDj9C8dHzosiMrLtxKfKpgk/l3hWVe0H4mWtAAwG69 UnoJeJye1yBDpUhAJB1R =1NoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EmW68jKGQIhj8inv--