From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 14 16:32:25 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9906016A4D4
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from ls405.t-com.hr (ls405.t-com.hr [195.29.150.135])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4971343DB6
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:29:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (ls242.t-com.hr [195.29.150.134])
	by ls405.t-com.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79F0147FB6;
	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 9181010F804D;
	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ls242.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 7987110F8056;
	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Envelope-Sender-Info: qNMqIwJL6pMxrLsv6Bv6Q8F59/kSM4ZBdZBv90IK0ovKYW+NL8qJhtwp0O8kWM3b
X-Envelope-Sender: ivoras@fer.hr
Received: from [10.0.0.102] (83-131-105-50.adsl.net.t-com.hr 
	[83.131.105.50])by ls242.t-com.hr (Qmali) with ESMTP id 421906C0055;
	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <45817C16.6060708@fer.hr>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:14 +0100
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
References: <20061213192150.CF83D16A417@hub.freebsd.org>	<200612131711.50921
	.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>	<4580DFAB.3080601@FreeBSD.org> 
	<200612140917.25523@aldan>	<elrr0d$8g1$1@sea.gmane.org> 
	<20061214074929.B47100@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061214074929.B47100@xorpc.icir.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-imss-version: 2.045
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scanInfo: M:P L:N SM:0
X-imss-tmaseResult: TT:0 TS:0.0000 TC:00 TRN:0 TV:3.6.1039(14872.003)
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:32:25 -0000

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:

>> For what it's worth: +1. It's going to be practically required even for
>> medium-performance applications as CPU clock rate stagnate and more
>> cores are grown. I've recently seen a 16-cpu x86 server in 1U! (granted,
>> 8 of those are hyperthreaded "CPUs" ;) )
> 
> and the other 8 are overheated CPUs ?

I see you're familiar with that product line :)