From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 27 16:41:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E59C16A40A for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C546B43D5C for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:41:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 4842 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2006 16:41:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DhiUtigBDQf70Q0EhSbjoAajwJnid5MdQa3BClnN6PSncG2N5BZMMTBGcm/YcZHUBdqPyENILJxg00U+QeLFpdUd6SCxe3rDtaLSR8y82kyU8CTbUbfK1+SvYV4eXdjY8iRAaAKxDKBmOXK1vkOkiIPdYydcZLZ/aJ4iLFd0IIg= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2006 16:41:55 -0000 Message-ID: <4450F459.60505@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:42:01 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca><444F8912.4010604@rogers.com><44505784.2030806@gneto.com> <4450EC9B.1050101@rogers.com><029201c66a16$a3c7e890$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <4450F0F2.9040102@rogers.com> <02b401c66a18$8058f230$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <02b401c66a18$8058f230$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Martin Nilsson Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:41:56 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Jakubik" >> >> Just look around the list on the continuous problems people have with >> that and the nve card. I would never feel safe putting these in >> production. > > I would agree with nve but not had any problems with bge > here and we put them under quite a bit of load as busy > DB, Web, FTP and Samba servers not to mention metric tone > of game servers. > Sure, not to say they are all broken, but many do have problems, so it becomes a gamble. > If you want a specific netcard nothing to stop you putting > in a PCI-X card which is what we do when we want Fibre, you > dont tend to find many MB netcards are fibre :) Yes there is, i need a 1U single Opteron board, with 2 integrated cards. I guess the current AMD offerings do not meet my requirements. I am working on a commercial product, which is an all in one 1U appliance (running fbsd of course), and i had to go with Intel just for reasons of availability, stability, and support.