From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 16 19:22:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2253B4 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8A41746 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id gq1so16084640obb.35 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluelife.at; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hOW+82Qm+fXAkoRuDnDZTlfyd0wKGD/4Tr47j6zYjEk=; b=GXdykMU2/IqCSiOSgTcCpcr+kiBo3s4WC4pHLx2+bXA9waoPu/MaAzrM20tL3YJrlp 1E8D2Cq+C6yrXErC0xknqXvmNBXCrVqP3Y0ES74EV++35IuqscgzX/lISPYbZEZHHtaF 479gdaHLOkW1JswzjYvdFPFLu0E2/S+l+d3gk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hOW+82Qm+fXAkoRuDnDZTlfyd0wKGD/4Tr47j6zYjEk=; b=PUEIkVO5R3+0Fkfkjpj/QTbQPmoMXswjbiinJ8t/UcjeR//jFv4ZHJ+nDT52Dg4VdD JqIckDcHhvJKQPfugJoD/RtekEhCDAvfMpP51CcXndHgM/KmxWzZSXA6Wweb5WbOUEqT 11KZH26F9bInjPcGp/PMIl0/9tBN+JjFNWPW14NjzrvV1T1Tq8N8rKKkI+QmOdDNcXuV hoqAJqAcMb3uiFbRKtIZLG6fXPdrH9HvoyLn8sIq6uQTZRtfm3LBMOVhSRT5nxuL3W49 wn4NemqZJ+td0w+Oz8Tq3Z7l+kr2hIhP1D9xXni+RakGdpQVaW0+5Ln3ezqBNxtg12nX 0lsw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkd3m7W27oeJnOSnaTUmWTUGVpd6WUoZ0kY+kyixHiacGu4oSNdEVqKNm+0bW0T4eFRPLA MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.116.74 with SMTP id ju10mr16977001oeb.6.1392578578282; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.144.71 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [89.144.223.201] Received: by 10.76.144.71 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:22:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FFC900.2010807@saltant.com> References: <52F8E7BB.4060700@saltant.com> <52FFA9A1.3050601@saltant.com> <52FFC900.2010807@saltant.com> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:22:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Redport builds are all "finished" without logs From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= To: "John W. O'Brien" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: xmj@chaot.net, ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:22:59 -0000 Am 15.02.2014 21:07 schrieb "John W. O'Brien" : > > On 2/15/14 12:53 PM, John W. O'Brien wrote: > > On 2/10/14 9:52 AM, John W. O'Brien wrote: > >> Could you help me understand what's going on with this build [0]? Did an > >> admin kill the job, and if so, why? Otherwise, what happened and is it > >> because I'm doing something wrong? > >> > >> [0] https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140210032800-24135/ > > > > Continuing to troubleshoot this. I've been adding ports to TEST_DEPENDS > > one by one, and found an instance where the /before/ [1] works but the > > /after/ [2] does not. > > > > The implicated port is math/py-statsmodels (maintainer CC'd). > > > > I'm still not clear on the circumstances under which Redports winds up > > in the "finished" state, and consequently am unable to avoid it or work > > around it. Any help or advice would be appreciated. > > > > [1] https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140215154500-1493/ > > [2] https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140215163200-621/ > > I see the problem. math/py-statsmodels depends on math/py-pandas. So the > bad news is that I cannot include the former in TEST_DEPENDS for the > latter and expect much at all from Redports. The good news is that I can > now fix my port to be more readily testable. > > For the benefit of those who come after, would it make sense to augment > the description of the "finished" state [3] to mention the possibility > of circular dependencies, which don't appear to be covered by the other > detectable termination conditions? > > Regards, > John > > [3] https://redports.org/wiki/Buildstatus I've added it to the wiki.