From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 30 00:15:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2902242F for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3C58FC18 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so14864787lah.13 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:15:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=umjPM7gCTmT/0LwQgwimVOa/hsSzHu4769NHpwhl0LY=; b=eK57JD+DEbqc15saLSoCBpmnn0GievA6ciaRMD5Y2bFJZMHKJ2yn1wuJDRsc6iuoVm IOwwSbaAUL8ksl+CdLhuvjsmjVMYwJhk/B3urMmd973Y+1wSSqnhBILHsKvfbF1V145o O1yuBjOiSP38CyQ6t8ppHzhlNzDtjB+QTlJ1c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=umjPM7gCTmT/0LwQgwimVOa/hsSzHu4769NHpwhl0LY=; b=DPEbw7t1ek6WOWsLj4Qqtga5OOgEGIE4hFHFLTrR1WUY0c5Saa2PMU6dgN1Clr0ZPZ 3O7nI5QiKtjN8QMbUDhV5208sxvxUk6moL76Tfc8mouu6MZUoDDg9HrrdTJPX7zvOjb4 4czMVomlP4DQ13JhQye4GCBErPgGqnzs0AyC+6d6XXjfYw6sI3XcYBfmzSDNZNdvm0Ey YPBDMy7/ILn0SyJg3hsfWg8NzlEtF3MxKGTu+R8n3JsbtJjdGMVfJQrqGSEl6/OyEjZz EmhfHaSTycAyIKqlP7WZZ/HrhVFStZKwsPcB11Bf2Ap22+RSBWZKl3Wvo2Pgc1f9TIxG T7ww== Received: by 10.112.17.170 with SMTP id p10mr90922lbd.53.1354234554038; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:15:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.112.154.168 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:15:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121130110154.E1441@besplex.bde.org> References: <201211291251.qATCpA7w078277@svn.freebsd.org> <20121130110154.E1441@besplex.bde.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:15:23 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Hg9N7v240W7HZpxO6ncdE1Za5PM Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r243670 - head/share/man/man5 To: Bruce Evans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkqJDYT/rfHWBiWZnE4QUyapTkZ6j6NlLiIzsFdiJfcvr10r/Si4PiHJ955kCz/3PM4zifJ Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:15:56 -0000 On 29 November 2012 19:09, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > "gcc" was mostly correct here, since the flags are unportable gcc ones. > They don't work with any "cc", but may work with clang, although this > is unclear since none of them is documented in clang(1). Every time I talk to the clang folk about flags they point me to gcc documentation. > However, I never would have agreed to putting any of them here. > > Lots here is now superseded by flags set by WARNS anyway. > > clang's even more unportable new flags are not documented in clang(1) > and the settings here are too old to have dreamed of these. The reference to BDECFLAGS actually isn't true - there is no such variable. There is a *commented out* version which I had planned to email you about at some point. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams