From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 9 16:41:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA15719 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:41:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from junior.apk.net (junior.apk.net [207.54.158.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA15714 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:41:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ipswitch@apk.net) Received: from localhost by junior.apk.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA10789; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 19:40:51 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: junior.apk.net: ipswitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 19:40:51 -0500 (EST) From: Ipswitch To: Willow cc: pat.groce@state.sd.us, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unix is a problem: free bsd doesn't help In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Willow wrote: > That's too bad that you feel that way. I know that if you would have > posted your questions here they would have been answered in easy to > understand steps and you might have been back up and running without > problems. It's amazing the people that they let run networks. I wonder whose brother he is? My company has had to "embrace" NT for some uses, but we sure aren't loony enough to use it for our mail servers. What really makes me scratch my head is Cisco. They are planning to use embedded NT in some of their products. It's a router, it's a web server, it's a floor polish! Why would anyone choose NT for an embedded OS? I thought you needed something small and stable for that? (QNX comes to mind) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message