From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Thu Dec 14 00:39:01 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC89E8C1B7
 for <freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 566C56A50F;
 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A06781160;
 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:38:53 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:38:52 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Mike Karels <karels@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Sendmail deprecation ?
Message-ID: <20171214003852.GA7123@lonesome.com>
References: <201712131321.vBDDL29q039904@mail.karels.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201712131321.vBDDL29q039904@mail.karels.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:39:01 -0000

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:21:02AM -0600, Mike Karels wrote:
> It seems to me that the option that is best-integrated, and which serves
> the needs of the greatest number of systems, is the sendmail in base.

I will submit the following from one of my boards:

# uname -a
FreeBSD orangepiplus2e 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #10 r326497M: Sun Dec  3 22:14:12 UTC 2017     linimon@burner12.lonesome.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENERIC  arm
# whereis sendmail
sendmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz /usr/ports/mail/sendmail

i.e. we are installing sendmail, by default, on single-board systems
that may have less than or equal to 512M of RAM.

I think this is silly.

mcl