From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 19 06:41:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F05F06837 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A624B8340C for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (203-59-173-201.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.59.173.201]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w1J6f8sb028934 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 22:41:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel! To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20171228203634.GK99670@rancor.immure.com> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:41:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171228203634.GK99670@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:41:13 -0000 On 29/12/17 4:36 am, Bob Willcox wrote: > Does anyone else feel that having 6100 subdirectories (939 are for py-* stuff) > is a bit excessive? I hadn't really looked at the number of subdirectories > there in quite a long time and was shocked to see how meny there are now. > yeah we really could do with a re-org.. like the languages (hungarian, japanese etc, not C, Perl ) shoudl be two levels down and we could do with a whole multi level setup. (why are we limited to just one level of directories?)