From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 16:15:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CE416A4CF for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D114043D1D for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 353831C000B4 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:15:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 11F401C00085 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:15:47 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050214161547738.11F401C00085@mwinf1104.wanadoo.fr Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:15:46 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <359956531.20050214171546@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050214075442.GA95608@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <1337541312.20050212132519@wanadoo.fr> <156527043.20050212140322@wanadoo.fr> <20050214075442.GA95608@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:15:48 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas writes: > Hmmm, how? There are several ways. I'll leave speculation on that as an exercise for the reader. > Very little can be said about a black box system. It's not a black box. Much of it is pretty well documented, although some of the documentation is now out of print, I think. > Now, when this is compared to something that is documented, clearly and > visibly, in an open source tree... we can see why the apparent stability > of NT is worth very little :-( Being documented and being readily accessible are two different things. The whole of medicine is very well documented by just about any decent public library, but that doesn't mean that having access to a library can make you a doctor. -- Anthony