From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 26 15: 6:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CD937B423 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 15:06:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from babolo@links.ru) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA20932; Sun, 27 May 2001 02:08:06 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <200105262208.CAA20932@aaz.links.ru> Subject: Re: technical comparison In-Reply-To: <20010526192516.A2573@gurney.reilly.home> from "Andrew Reilly" at "May 26, 1 07:25:16 pm" To: areilly@bigpond.net.au (Andrew Reilly) Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 02:08:06 +0400 (MSD) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: .@babolo.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrew Reilly writes: > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 08:49:21PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > There is _no_ performance problem with "the existing implementation", > > if you treat "postgres" as "the existing implementation"; it will do > > what you want, quickly and effectively, for millions of record keys. > > Does postgres make a good mail archive database? Can it handle Yes, I look at it to replace my messarge. > arbitrary record lengths? It couldn't the last time I looked at > it. Now (7.1) it can. -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message