From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Oct 1 14:43:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFD010BF5E0 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oshogbo.vx@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DDC79C16 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 14:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oshogbo.vx@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id q39-v6so8661408lfi.8 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:43:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fi5gy0Q04L+1gP8KMnw+tOZ0KCCoZisv2CX2qWJb9uM=; b=L0yPdZ6snIMQNwhMoKjTSIWuHsdnwfV1IrLOkMU/YTP8tzpHD7AgXhazw+M7lXc3CV oBaf/jJDrEEFCp8H7EJR4O7eg4GCbCTDo+WA49LO82pCVa47Zh0PYqpHURIj1yOwh2YX nf5k2rOyVt7gkMRfbi+dDEOMmHy8lrOtyOc5O6cik3wX7L4EYWKdM5P6us+9vYybgffj fC/W5DBqG/2O+og5woSaAgRqmOiPF3zkBL9URvJroLzLWSuBHpPbCznMrwxOuPgW/7oe Oqzjjzu46RK7CFKB6+8hbJ24zGWdXtREonj+yMfNosGEMiuLyM/R9AezbegMT9lC/s+s 6M6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fi5gy0Q04L+1gP8KMnw+tOZ0KCCoZisv2CX2qWJb9uM=; b=r02md5G+7Hd+xygV04E+efbgGi7xFc+efxHdgKsy4NVh4QohKndEDEbtAi0jPhC+u7 KvISkzFW+0gaQM8HR+8b0kMMbAv+83JalJnxLmyJ0M43X/qQoqXCl/PTUPESv/waMHc4 KA/Vc/yZpww2iylMvtaWillcELl/kYeXPUPXGyN0ErKkRCq4uVtaXEcLjRfm4jHEET5p Re9l3LeLxP/5+zsVCO2FQcvhVOgQHUjNLH6rsgMLxYJHCK1fy7E8vRk/mDh+EKSBtUqW 3589NomAKdk7wjmsGFBtyx/Yb42JwFd0KK1U7vFef+TXqdY8EnexUFYQa4txljrATMXE ROVA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiGmtCNTv3pbcY/2+TihKdNOjXSGtow+0zkKs1ekaM9v9q5jomO +vAnFqlGIlKOP8AQlVZtH3I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62Q2PzEy2/m0B1dulhuPC9Rt90BQx2+r3Ux/uKXWSryt3ywSlpwDaP1NfI9XYWoo72lT5154g== X-Received: by 2002:a19:98c1:: with SMTP id a184-v6mr5489907lfe.94.1538405017664; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x-wing (87-206-170-77.dynamic.chello.pl. [87.206.170.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14-v6sm2352765lfh.10.2018.10.01.07.43.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mariusz Zaborski Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 16:43:35 +0200 From: Mariusz Zaborski To: Claude Buisson Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: traceroute -n difference between STABLE-11 and CURRENT Message-ID: <20181001144335.GA84330@x-wing> References: <4c75a92e-e107-9a77-aff5-fd914c7527b9@orange.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4c75a92e-e107-9a77-aff5-fd914c7527b9@orange.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:43:40 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On systems with STABLE-11 @ r338696, I found that >=20 > traceroute -n ... >=20 > led to: >=20 > traceroute: cap_enter: Function not implemented >=20 > I rebuilt the systems with >=20 > WITHOUT_CASPER >=20 > commented in /etc/src.conf >=20 > and (to be safe ?) >=20 > CAPABILITY_MODE > CAPABILITIES >=20 > uncommented in the kernel definitions >=20 > And traceroute -n can now be successfully used. >=20 > Being curious, I traced this behaviour to r338475 by oshogbo, which is=20 > documented as a MFC of r314000 >=20 > BUT i NEVER met this problem on my CURRENT systems which are now at=20 > r338331 (so after r314000), and are built WITHOUT_CASPER and without=20 > CAPABILITY_MODE nor CAPABILITIES in their kernel definitions. >=20 > What am I missing (my only hint being the change from HAVE_LIBCASPER to= =20 > WITH_CASPER) ? >=20 > CBu Hello, sorry for keep you waiting. Your issue should be fixed with the r339045 in STABLE-11. Thanks, --=20 Mariusz Zaborski oshogbo//vx | http://oshogbo.vexillium.org FreeBSD committer | https://freebsd.org Software developer | http://wheelsystems.com If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is!!1 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkD1x0xkJXVVY1Gwf38KEGuLGxWQFAluyMpIACgkQ38KEGuLG xWTcJw/9Ey5g4MTg/momFOoTAEBCVvcsB+b/cjAGARUN+01q4tFelqgETiixwtam v7V8oHW/NYixGPGNGCJJhcWKcFU7rhy7UTQQVaMYSwI5ZKGISYgNz44tLpq5FY47 NrqdbmIKC0iFipCa+s6k6UOXUZfjgrbmL8LxNL6G3X1nkfhqMXGfXTUYLXaBuU9s ZnfvZDKOS4Kkn6rvIvlt2gP50f9oXaxnfLHdWObYAgD8hSUUFV9qXBzoGaSLXj/R 1fBlLP/02lQ1ITb90gWcADUmzyPJ+onEDlKGCrS1DkjvloeDxCq7TvAlMPDuZ4Nd mF1aYf+0VKoMW1TIdQfDJTfvDdvVmU0Eqld8T3IcZJ6N4dUitVhCnjoiyJtZtrnZ uDhq49J2WENlZQAMJrjheFGgIAqQ/iHCM8csIoAh6tWE/DjPkoSo7KJgVUsR7U5q 8rVTkzqqPPd/c8KfC3dxhqDt5hviqbEybbshNqhgbZTX41ZePcS1RgOXAb34Bskv PRFB+i/dQUjYubZw+IDwrEpcMBetWyY/rNeCQSSnRL41HpDbyqgc9dnQZqg03rtL vrY20DW7L0R+PRy7TC5ZoVfkbCd6eE01Pxxz03KQL27LTRiaLvI5z+1d1dxcvUIq wwHwiNaH++qcNIYmtovJHQq71Nmaps/obXolGsStffgY0t40g0E= =cPSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--