From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 18:01:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF16E16A4CE; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:01:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D0543D3F; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:01:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA9336905; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:02:52 +0200 From: Miguel Mendez To: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <20041026200252.3b2ff9b0.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <417E8D24.6050201@elischer.org> References: <417DB5E1.7000308@freebsd.org> <20041026085627.008f8f7e.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <417E8D24.6050201@elischer.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040918 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__26_Oct_2004_20_02_52_+0200_sFH7lp=l7DfIal.." cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: scottl@freebsd.org cc: developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ULE off in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:01:38 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__26_Oct_2004_20_02_52_+0200_sFH7lp=l7DfIal.. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:45:08 -0700 Julian Elischer wrote: > >What are the short term plans for ULE? I understand turning it off > >for RELENG_5, so I take it will be tested in HEAD? ULE has many nice > >features and it would be a shame that it wasn't tested well enough so > >that bugs can eventually be fixed. > > > > the plan is that Someone (maybe you?) fixes it.. > jeffr seems to have had collision with Real Life (TM) which is using > all his spare time. I see, thanks. Some time ago I read Jeff's paper and barely looked at some parts of the code, but IMHO it's too big a task for a single person. OTOH, now that Matthew Seaman has released his portindex replacement (which means mine can wait indefinitely) I might give this a go, $REAL_JOB workload notwithstanding. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 Note: All HTML mail goes to /dev/null --Signature=_Tue__26_Oct_2004_20_02_52_+0200_sFH7lp=l7DfIal.. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfpFPnLctrNyFFPERAnmQAJ9GKDXGF/gwCmkH230wrkL3GMsU7QCfa3v1 3G/gCnCBb5cFRxGh6RH8Xs0= =S+hz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__26_Oct_2004_20_02_52_+0200_sFH7lp=l7DfIal..--