From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Tue Jan 10 00:27:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73563CA6343 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhtooefr@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542351AD8 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhtooefr@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 507A3CA6340; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E75BCA633D for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhtooefr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06DD31AD7 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bhtooefr@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x49so85844276qtc.2 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:27:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QUX8QYDkHUU2FMrEy2OqnEh6wZc2RV/xhMypnU5+F50=; b=rQrH8zxqgjJMTcFLAQXrgsd/pEDeSuub1QsHwBfj5OGL73Pfn0/w/JoOyIoomcsmpU /TbKHewEQZyOZ/PSbSm//WFt/F1kmqUU1OukCw3PbEx6r/Bq1ADemeJf+ml0cRUSwOuX gl5dqq9rZX554JA3cHPhUxx5X6SW1Uqm+YwL8bC4f60EYOArVXi9eV/zwuhcc9nasqfz UyEwQG4B5r2t5KicuRSDP8YUwhgcmyMzmNwxLIpAajEuQ2tgpxrlCBrkV2kV+i++8qaG gto46yppLRNC6sF/uusXKkOic5T8xyXxFCJYmcO4/xvpTUDJ5y5YGfofTQl6GQfvEupz 3ZSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QUX8QYDkHUU2FMrEy2OqnEh6wZc2RV/xhMypnU5+F50=; b=MuWA7t0gf0eghhvMxi+AvWKR8ZW9RcLrNSAn5IEgsmycQIiz6P7FTAQKvPjsRMkvIS LIjcrEmz2Yqj4kJUNuP5vmVjzXSRxB213F22DyJQhh7e0sFNBNO+fShUW1PfjDKGPTWf c4yGiQMZUZBzVJbPotl5ivyPcf5bwoC39KiyyU+49Q8Y3xWHlFvoZRnCrvu70ftcXf0m 25jjSW4VWcXhjPq8LFN0h9yLvsz8w/aZXhRCoX6XC2dY1jpo9WmdA6XOSXnxAQpjbYjv ZJ9cTBtbjP0yTFJgyNymTk/n/X5rRJ9J2u3bRaleDJMhe3IM5ER80eLeV3kjHwuCEUQw 027g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJuFO3HhkcFMzIsRhkpa/Tx8mkn67fjCUjjpWpsIYTwAycQR3M4h58NfseOuAl71mvK3GWvjOKqiLhPPw== X-Received: by 10.200.55.205 with SMTP id e13mr324622qtc.69.1484008022252; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:27:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.129.228 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:26:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170110001533.GK8460@kduck.kaduk.org> References: <20170110001533.GK8460@kduck.kaduk.org> From: Eric Rucker Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:26:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE upgrading comments To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: doc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:27:03 -0000 Ben, I've already upgraded to 10.3-RELEASE, and do not have uname -a output available from the system before the upgrade. But, this should be good enough, from the last kernel log from before I upgraded: +FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p49 #0: Fri Oct 21 21:01:08 UTC 2016 + root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I was at the latest patchlevel (p53 - p49 was the last kernel patchlevel, it appears) before attempting the upgrade. -Eric On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 08:13:06AM -0500, Eric Rucker wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've noticed that I was unable to perform an upgrade directly to >> FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE from 9.3-RELEASE by following the directions in >> this document: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.0R/installation.html >> >> Upon attempting to run freebsd-update upgrade -R 11.0-RELEASE, I >> received the error "The update metadata is correctly signed, but >> failed an integrity check." I received no such error going to >> 10.3-RELEASE instead. >> >> Is this a bug, or a documentation error? > > I am more inclined to suspect documentation error, in that IIRC there > was an errata notice relating to how integrity checks were done on updates, > which was needed in order to update past a version boundary in that range. > > Are you at the latest 9.3 patchlevel already? If not, it's probably best > to take all available updates within 9.3 before attempting the major version > upgrade. (That is, please show the `uname -a` output from the system > in question.) > > -Ben