From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 19 16:50:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 680) id 9070F16A4CF; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:50:41 -0700 From: Darren Reed To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20040519235041.GA27694@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040518181314.GA69389@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040518181314.GA69389@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 May 2004 04:47:47 -0700 cc: darrenr@freebsd.org cc: mlaier@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf.h rev 1.142 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:50:41 -0000 I am slowly coming to the conclusion that this macro belongs in a .c file, possibly with the original name. When it was in ip_var.h, it meant you needed to include sys/mbuf.h in everything and now you've highlighted another dependency problem. This macro seems to be causing problems everywhere it goes... Darren